A few years ago, I was helping a fast-growing B2B SaaS company rethink its sales compensation model. They were scaling rapidly, but leadership felt something wasn’t working. Reps were hitting quota, but the business wasn’t seeing sustained growth. Customer churn was rising. Expansion opportunities were being missed. And sales behavior felt reactive, not strategic.
When we audited their compensation plan, the issue was clear: It was built entirely on commissions tied to closed revenue. There was no incentive to prioritize long-term account value, cross-sell motions, or even collaborate with post-sales teams.
That project pushed me to explore a different approach, Management by Objectives (MBO). It reframed how we could align compensation with company goals that go beyond just closing deals.
In this blog, I’ll break down what MBO sales compensation really is, how it works, and steps to design a plan that aligns sales behavior with your company’s strategic goals.
What is MBO Sales Compensation?
MBO sales compensation is a performance-based pay model that rewards salespeople for achieving predefined, measurable objectives. It aligns individual goals with company strategy, motivating employees to focus on both revenue and strategic outcomes.
MBO plans define clear targets, track KPIs, and structure payouts based on results. Sales leaders use this approach to drive behaviors like client retention, product adoption, and CRM usage.
Unlike commission-only models, MBO compensation supports non-revenue goals and long-term impact. This structure improves transparency, encourages accountability, and fits hybrid sales roles with diverse responsibilities.
In sales compensation, MBOs are utilized to incentivize behaviors that drive desired outcomes, especially when direct sales metrics aren't the sole focus.
How it is Different from Traditional Commission Models
Traditional commission models are designed around transactional efficiency. Close a deal, log the revenue, and earn a percentage. This works well in straightforward, high-velocity sales environments where every rep is pushing a similar product to a broad audience with short sales cycles.
But it starts to break down in more nuanced selling environments, like enterprise software, multi-stakeholder deals, or strategic accounts, where value creation isn't linear and often can't be measured in a single transaction.
This is where MBOs offer a smarter framework. Instead of tying earnings to deal size or volume alone, MBO compensation rewards specific outcomes that reflect how value is delivered to the customer and the business. That might mean accelerating product adoption within an account, deepening executive engagement, or helping marketing fine-tune ICP alignment based on prospect feedback.
If a company wants to grow wallet share, an MBO plan might reward a rep for expanding product adoption within an existing account, even if the overall deal value is small. Traditional commission models may miss this kind of progress, but MBOs highlight strategic actions that support long-term growth and retention.
Reasons Businesses Use MBO-Based Pay Structures
The motivation behind MBO isn’t just structure. It's a strategy. Companies adopt MBO-based compensation to:
- Reorient sales teams around business-critical goals. Not everything that matters can be tracked by revenue. MBOs ensure reps contribute to goals like reducing churn, driving product adoption, or expanding into new markets.
- Create more adaptive performance measurements. As business goals shift quarterly, MBOs allow you to adjust objectives quickly. That’s harder to do with rigid quota structures.
- Incentivize the non-obvious work. Discovery, strategic planning, and partner collaboration often get neglected in traditional comp plans. MBOs put a spotlight on the behavior that builds pipelines and relationships.
- Break down departmental silos. When sales objectives are tied to shared outcomes, like onboarding efficiency or customer lifetime value, collaboration becomes a necessity, not a nice-to-have.
SHRM recommends ensuring that MBO-related bonuses represent at least 10% of a rep’s compensation package. That helps drive focus and ensures these goals get the attention they deserve.
A company expanding its footprint into a new vertical might use MBOs to incentivize exploratory work: qualifying new leads, identifying key accounts, and running pilot campaigns. These actions build market traction, even if they don’t close immediate revenue.
How MBO Works in Sales Compensation
In my experience, MBOs work best when they’re built around three core principles:
1. Clarity
Objectives should be specific and measurable. Vague goals like “improve relationships” or “increase satisfaction” don’t provide direction. Instead, set clear outcomes, like reducing onboarding time for new clients or increasing product usage in a strategic account. If a goal can’t be objectively tracked, it won’t drive performance.
2. Alignment
Individual goals should tie directly into broader team or company priorities. For example, if marketing is targeting a new segment, sales MBOs should focus on engaging those accounts. I’ve seen misalignment lead to teams unintentionally working against each other, not from lack of effort but from poor incentive design.
3. Consistency
MBOs need regular review cycles. I recommend setting them quarterly and revisiting them mid-cycle. In one project, we set annual MBOs and didn’t adjust them. Market conditions changed, and reps lost motivation because the goals no longer made sense. Frequent check-ins ensure relevance, fairness, and continued engagement.
When applied well, MBOs give reps clarity on what success looks like beyond revenue alone. They also give leaders confidence that comp plans are driving business priorities.
This structure works especially well for roles that support revenue indirectly, like account managers or customer success teams. It gives them a clear performance framework without forcing them into traditional sales quotas.
Pros & Cons of MBO in Sales Compensation
.png)
MBOs can be powerful when used in the right context. But they also require thoughtful implementation.
Pros of MBO Sales Compensation Plan
- Aligns incentives with strategy. Sales teams are rewarded for driving business priorities, not just for closing deals.
- Improves evaluation transparency. With clearly defined objectives, it’s easier to assess performance objectively.
- Encourages long-term thinking. Reps are incentivized to prioritize sustainable growth, not just short-term wins.
Cons of MBO Sales Compensation Plan
- Goal-setting is complex. Crafting realistic, measurable, and impactful objectives takes time and cross-functional alignment.
- Risk of subjective evaluation. Even with clear goals, interpretations can vary if expectations aren’t communicated properly.
- Narrow focus can backfire. When MBOs are too specific, reps may ignore other important responsibilities that don’t tie directly to compensation.
When to Use an MBO Sales Compensation Plan
You should consider using MBOs when:
- Sales roles influence but don’t directly close deals. This includes customer success, account management, and pre-sales, where outcomes are strategic and long-term.
- You’re operating with limited or indirect performance data. If attribution is difficult or delayed, MBOs offer a structured way to reward effort and impact.
- You’re launching a new product or entering a new market. In early go-to-market phases, reps may not generate immediate revenue, but their activities, like prospect education and account mapping, are mission-critical.
- Team-based selling is common. If success depends on collaboration between sales, product, and marketing, MBOs can reflect shared responsibility and outcomes.
- Sales cycles are long or unpredictable. For enterprise sales or industries with high consideration cycles, reps need to be motivated even before deals close. MBOs ensure their effort doesn’t go unrecognized.
For example, in a tech company preparing for its first enterprise product launch, sales might focus on building customer relationships, collecting feedback, and educating prospects. These are essential inputs but don’t show up in revenue immediately. In that case, an MBO plan that rewards those activities helps keep motivation and alignment high.
How to Create an MBO Sales Compensation Plan
.png)
Creating an effective MBO sales compensation plan takes more than setting goals and assigning bonuses. It requires thoughtful planning, coordination across departments, and continuous refinement. Here's a structured approach that’s worked well in my experience:
Step 1: Identify business priorities and role expectations
Start by understanding what the company is trying to achieve in the next quarter or year. Are you focused on market expansion, reducing churn, improving product adoption, or launching a new offering? Once clear, break those priorities down into what success looks like for each sales role.
For example, if you're entering a new market, a sales development rep’s MBO might include generating discovery calls with target accounts. For a customer success manager, the objective might be to secure QBRs with key clients in that new segment.
Step 2: Collaborate to define measurable objectives
Work with frontline managers and sales leaders to translate business goals into SMART objectives. These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. Looping in cross-functional stakeholders ensures that the goals support broader company initiatives.
A strong MBO could be: "Conduct onboarding sessions with 90 percent of new customers within the first 14 days." A weak one would be: "Ensure customers are happy." Precision matters here.
Step 3: Assign appropriate weight and compensation value
Not all MBOs are created equal. Assign each objective a weight based on its impact on business outcomes. This step is critical to signal priority and avoid spreading effort too thin.
For example, if customer retention is the number one focus this quarter, an account manager’s retention-related MBO might account for 50 percent of their variable pay. Less critical goals, like participating in internal training, might hold less weight.
Step 4: Define success metrics and evaluation methods
Clarify what success looks like and how it will be measured. Will it be based on CRM data, customer feedback, activity logs, or manager evaluation? Document these expectations up front to minimize ambiguity.
Also, decide whether the MBO is binary (goal met or not met) or scaled (partial credit for partial completion). In my experience, combining both can create the right balance of accountability and flexibility.
Step 5: Build tracking mechanisms and feedback loops
Even well-defined MBOs can fail without proper monitoring. Use systems like CRM dashboards, internal trackers, or shared reporting tools to give reps and managers ongoing visibility into progress.
Schedule regular check-ins to assess performance, remove roadblocks, and recalibrate goals if needed. This keeps momentum high and prevents last-minute surprises.
Step 6: Review, analyze, and adjust quarterly
At the end of each MBO cycle, gather data on outcomes and feedback from reps and managers. What worked well? What goals felt achievable? Where did the process break down?
Use this input to refine your next round of MBOs. A good plan should evolve based on company priorities, market shifts, and internal learnings. MBOs that remain static quickly lose their relevance.
By following these six steps, you not only improve the structure of your sales compensation plan but also strengthen alignment across departments, reinforce strategic goals, and create a more engaged sales force.
Best Practices for Implementing an MBO-Based Compensation Model
Even the most well-designed MBO plan can fall flat without the right execution. Based on what I’ve seen across multiple teams, these best practices can make the difference between a motivating system and a frustrating one:
1. Connect MBOs to long-term business objectives
Every MBO should tie back to what the business is trying to achieve beyond the current quarter. If your company is focused on retention, for example, MBOs should reflect that in ways that promote sustainable outcomes, not short-term wins.
2. Use data to guide and measure performance
Make performance tracking objective and transparent. Wherever possible, use CRM data, product usage analytics, or customer surveys to validate whether a rep has met a goal. This avoids disputes and builds trust in the system.
3. Involve reps early in the goal-setting process
Top-down MBOs often miss the context from the field. Involving sales reps and managers when setting goals improves relevance, accountability, and buy-in. It also helps surface challenges you might otherwise miss.
4. Avoid vague or unrealistic goals
A goal like “improve customer engagement” is too abstract. Goals that are too ambitious without proper support can quickly demotivate your team. Focus on setting clear, achievable objectives that stretch people without setting them up to fail.
5. Keep MBOs flexible but not fuzzy
Things change. Markets shift. Strategies evolve. Review MBOs mid-cycle and allow for thoughtful adjustments. But make sure expectations are clearly documented so everyone understands the rules of the game.
These practices don’t just improve the structure of your MBO plan. They increase credibility, reduce confusion, and help your sales team focus on what really matters.
MBO Sales Compensation vs. Other Pay Models
Choosing the right sales compensation model depends on your goals, sales cycle, and what you’re trying to incentivize. MBOs offer a different kind of leverage than traditional models, especially when you need reps to focus on strategic outcomes beyond short-term deals.
Here’s how MBO compares to other common approaches:
MBO vs. Commission-Based Pay
Commission-based models reward sales reps based solely on the revenue or volume they close. This works well in fast-moving sales environments with shorter cycles and direct attribution.
MBO, by contrast, focuses on achieving specific, predefined goals. These goals might include improving onboarding outcomes, driving product adoption, or increasing engagement in underpenetrated accounts. MBO is more outcome-oriented than transactional.
MBO vs. Bonus-Based Pay
Bonuses are often discretionary or based on overall performance reviews. They may reward general success but don’t always provide clear guidance on what actions lead to the payout.
MBOs are more structured. Reps know what’s expected, how success will be measured, and exactly how it ties into compensation. That makes MBO plans better suited to driving consistent, strategic behavior.
MBO vs. Hybrid Compensation Models
Hybrid models combine multiple structures, such as base salary plus commissions and MBOs. These models are flexible and can balance revenue generation with strategic priorities.
For example, a rep might earn a commission on deals closed while also receiving MBO bonuses for completing key initiatives like launching a new product line or supporting cross-functional programs.
When to Choose MBO Over Other Models
- When you want to reinforce strategic, non-revenue goals like retention, adoption, or team collaboration
- When roles influence outcomes but aren’t directly quota-carrying
- When you're launching into new markets or products that require reps to do groundwork before deals materialize
- When success depends on activity quality, not just deal volume
Comparison Table: MBO vs. Other Pay Models
MBO Sales Compensation Plan Template
A simplified and reusable template to build an MBO comp plan:
Objective
Improve product adoption within strategic customer accounts.
Performance Metric
% increase in monthly active users across target accounts, tracked via product analytics.
Example
Suppose a customer success rep manages 50 key accounts, and last quarter, 20 had consistent product usage. This quarter’s MBO is to raise that to 30 active accounts. The goal is specific, measurable, and aligned with the company’s adoption initiative.
Incentive Structure
If the rep meets or exceeds the MBO goal, they receive a $1,500 bonus. For 80–99% attainment, a partial payout is awarded. To avoid overpayment, the MBO is capped at 120% of the target. For roles without direct revenue ownership, such caps help control costs while keeping incentives motivating.
Review Period
Quarterly, with performance tracked through adoption dashboards and discussed in monthly 1:1s.
Why this works
The rep’s effort influences product usage, which contributes to retention and upselling but doesn’t directly drive revenue. An MBO allows you to incentivize that influence without relying solely on commissions.
This format can easily be adapted for goals like:
- Increasing sales pipeline quality
- Improving onboarding completion rates
- Generating customer feedback through QBRs
Use MBOs where behavior matters just as much as outcomes, and be sure to calibrate goals that are challenging but realistic.
Is MBO the Right Fit for Your Sales Team?
MBO-based compensation is a great fit for companies that want to align their sales efforts with broader strategic goals. Instead of focusing only on revenue, this model emphasizes long-term outcomes like improving customer experience, driving product adoption, and strengthening internal collaboration. It works particularly well for organizations with long sales cycles and complex, multi-touch processes.
That said, implementing MBOs requires a solid foundation, clear goal-setting, measurable success criteria, and the right tools to track performance. Without this structure, execution can quickly become inconsistent or overly subjective. But when done right, MBOs create accountability, motivation, and clarity across roles that often fall outside traditional quota-based models.
If your team is contributing across different stages of the customer journey and your company has defined strategic priorities that extend beyond short-term wins, MBOs can provide the structure to reinforce those behaviors effectively..
Book a call with our team to see how Everstage makes MBOs easy to run and impactful to scale. From setting goals to tracking performance and automating payouts, Everstage gives you the infrastructure to turn strategy into measurable results.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MBO compensation in sales?
MBO sales compensation is a performance-based pay model where sales professionals receive bonuses for achieving predefined strategic objectives. These objectives are tailored to align with company goals and may go beyond revenue targets, focusing on outcomes like customer retention, CRM hygiene, or product adoption.
How does MBO compensation work for sales teams?
MBO compensation works by setting clear, measurable objectives for sales reps that align with the company’s strategic goals. Each objective has an assigned value and a review cycle, typically quarterly. Sales reps are rewarded only when those goals are met, ensuring accountability and alignment.
What are examples of MBO objectives in sales?
Common MBO objectives include improving customer retention, increasing upsell rates, completing CRM data updates, boosting client onboarding success, or enhancing cross-functional collaboration. These goals are often customized based on the rep’s role or territory.
What are the pros and cons of MBO-based incentive plans?
MBO plans align employee performance with business goals and promote transparency in evaluation. However, they require precise goal-setting and may lead to over-focusing on specific tasks. They are best used when objectives can be clearly defined and measured.
How do MBO goals differ from traditional sales quotas?
Unlike sales quotas, which are typically revenue-based, MBO goals focus on a broader range of strategic objectives. MBOs can include non-revenue tasks, such as improving customer engagement or process adherence, making them ideal for hybrid or enablement-focused roles.
What KPIs should be used in MBO compensation for sales reps?
Effective KPIs include customer retention rates, upsell conversions, time to onboard new clients, CRM activity accuracy, and product adoption metrics. These KPIs help track goal achievement and ensure fair, performance-based compensation.